ATI FireGL V5600 vs AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V5600 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Duo Polaris to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V5600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (89W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Duo Polaris 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 35.20GB/s)
2184 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V5600
0.192 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Duo Polaris
+2883%
5.728 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Apr 2017
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro GCN
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1100 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
35.20GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
3
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
120
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
64 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
6.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.728 TFLOPS
192.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
89W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV630
GPU Name
Ellesmere
RV630 GL
GPU Variant
Ellesmere Gemini GL
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
65 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.39 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
153 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7
