Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

ATI FireGL V7600 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireGL V7600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (127W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
16576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +16066%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2024
FireGL
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM3e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
320
Shading Units
16896
16
TMUs
528
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

127W
TDP
1000W
300 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
GB100
R600 GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
208 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
N/A
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy