Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

ATI FireGL V7600 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FireGL V7600 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock2331MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 127W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V7600
0.384 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +832%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jan 2022
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
2331 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
4
Compute Units
12
320
Shading Units
768
16
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
9.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
384.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Navi 24
R600 GL
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Board Design

127W
TDP
50W
300 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy