Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA CMP 50HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 10GB VRAM CMP 50HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA CMP 50HX 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (10GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (560.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
3264 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
CMP 50HX +2415%
11.07 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2021
FireGL
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1350 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
10GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
320bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
560.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
56
320
Shading Units
3584
16
TMUs
192
16
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
56
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
5 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
123.6 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.15 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.07 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
346.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
TU102
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
TU102-100-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
18.6 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
754 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net