Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD FirePro W7000

ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD FirePro W7000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM FirePro W7000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro W7000 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (153.6GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
FirePro W7000 +452%
2.432 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Jun 2012
FireGL
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
256bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.432 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
152.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
Pitcairn
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
TeraScale
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net