ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9400 GT PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireGL V8650 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.1GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
304 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9400 GT PCI 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
+877%
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce 9400 GT PCI
0.045 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2008
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCI
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
868 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR4
Memory Type
DDR2
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
2
320
Shading Units
16
16
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.200 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
44.80 GFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x VGA
1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
G96C
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
55 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
121 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
3.3
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0
