ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 24GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2520MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.01TB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
16064 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4090
+18668%
82.58 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Sep 2022
FireGL
Generation
GeForce 40
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2235 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2520 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1313 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6X
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
1.01TB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
128
320
Shading Units
16384
16
TMUs
512
16
ROPs
176
-
Tensor Cores
512
-
RT Cores
128
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
72 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
443.5 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1290 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
82.58 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
82.58 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1290 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
450W
200 W
Suggested PSU
850 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
AD102
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
AD102-300-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
