ATI FireGL V8650 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5300
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro 5300 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon Pro 5300 's Advantages
Released 13 years late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
960 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro 5300
+860%
4.224 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Aug 2007
Release Date
Aug 2020
FireGL
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
128bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s
Render Config
4
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
320
Shading Units
1280
16
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.80 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
132.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.448 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.224 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
264.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
85W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
R600
GPU Name
Navi 14
R600 V8650
(215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
Navi 14 PRO XE
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
6.4 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
158 mm²
Graphics Features
10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3 (full)
4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.5
