Home GPU Comparison ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

ATI FireGL V8650 vs NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FireGL V8650 and 48GB VRAM RTX 6000 Ada to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 6000 Ada 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2505MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (960.0GB/s vs 111.1GB/s)
17856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FireGL V8650
0.44 TFLOPS
RTX 6000 Ada +20595%
91.06 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Aug 2007
Release Date
Dec 2022
FireGL
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
915 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2505 MHz
868 MHz
Memory Clock
2500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR4
Memory Type
GDDR6
512bit
Memory Bus
384bit
111.1GB/s
Bandwidth
960.0GB/s

Render Config

4
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
142
320
Shading Units
18176
16
TMUs
568
16
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
568
-
RT Cores
142
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

11.01 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
481.0 GPixel/s
11.01 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1423 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
91.06 TFLOPS
440.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
91.06 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1423 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

R600
GPU Name
AD102
R600 V8650 (215RGIDKA13FG)
GPU Variant
AD102
TeraScale
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.72 billion
Transistors
76.3 billion
420 mm²
Die Size
609 mm²

Graphics Features

10.0 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3 (full) 4.0 (partial)
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net