Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon Pro W6900X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 32GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6900X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 300W)
AMD Radeon Pro W6900X 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock2150MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Aug 2021
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1825 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2150 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
32GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
80
-
Shading Units
5120
4
TMUs
320
4
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
275.2 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
688.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
44.03 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
22.02 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1376 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Navi 21
-
GPU Variant
Navi 21 Pro-XTA
R500
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
7 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
26.8 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
300W
200 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 4x Thunderbolt
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.1
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
3.0
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy