Home GPU Comparison ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 vs AMD Radeon R9 280

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FireMV 2250 PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 200W)
AMD Radeon R9 280 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock933MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2007
Release Date
Mar 2014
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 1.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
827 MHz
-
Boost Clock
933 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR2
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
240.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
-
Shading Units
1792
4
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
-
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.86 GPixel/s
2.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
104.5 GTexel/s
-
-
-
-
FP32 (float)
3.344 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
836.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
200W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x DVI 2x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV516
GPU Name
Tahiti
-
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO3 (215-0821330)
R500
Architecture
GCN 1.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.107 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

9.0c (9_3)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
2.1
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
3.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy