ATI FireMV 2400 PCI vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 16 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2816 additional rendering cores
Score
Graphics Card
Jan 2008
Release Date
Feb 2024
FireMV Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCI
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
128MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
16.00GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
22
-
Shading Units
2816
4
TMUs
88
4
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
2.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
70W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
RV380
GPU Name
AD107
-
-
-
Rage 9
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
130 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.075 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
92 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²
Graphics Features
9.0
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
2.0
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
-
Shader Model
6.7
