Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 106W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (22.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
104 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 3 +1309%
0.451 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jul 2012
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
400 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
1024MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
40
Shading Units
144
4
TMUs
24
4
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.698 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.79 GTexel/s
-
-
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
451.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
37.58 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
106W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 1.3a
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GF116
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
GF116-200-KA-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.17 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
238 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
2.1
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy