Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 vs NVIDIA NVS 810

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 and 2GB VRAM NVS 810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 68W)
NVIDIA NVS 810 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1033MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (14.40GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
472 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View PCIe x1
0.032 TFLOPS
NVS 810 +3206%
1.058 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Nov 2015
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x1
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
902 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1033 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
2
Compute Units
-
40
Shading Units
512
4
TMUs
32
4
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
-
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.53 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
33.06 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1058 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
33.06 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GM107
RC620 PRO
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
1.87 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
148 mm²

Board Design

32W
TDP
68W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
8x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy