ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs Intel Arc A750
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM Arc A750 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 225W)
Intel Arc A750 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2400MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
3544 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Arc A750
+53650%
17.2 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Oct 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 7)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2050 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2400 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
3584
4
TMUs
224
4
ROPs
112
-
Tensor Cores
448
-
RT Cores
28
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
268.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
537.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.41 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
17.20 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
2.150 TFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
225W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
DG2-512
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
