ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A4000H
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 16GB VRAM RTX A4000H to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 140W)
NVIDIA RTX A4000H 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
6104 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX A4000H
+59806%
19.17 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
735 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
48
40
Shading Units
6144
4
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
149.8 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS
Board Design
32W
TDP
140W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
RV620
GPU Name
GA104
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GPU Variant
GA104-???-A1
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
17.4 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
392 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7
