Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and 8GB VRAM RTX A5000 8Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5000-8Q 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
8152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
RTX A5000 8Q +86681%
27.77 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Apr 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1170 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
64
40
Shading Units
8192
4
TMUs
256
4
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
256
-
RT Cores
64
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
433.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
27.77 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
27.77 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
433.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
230W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x VHDCI
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
GA102
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.6
4.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy