Home GPU Comparison ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU

ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View vs AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU

We compared a Desktop platform GPU: 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View and a Game console GPU: 16GB VRAM Ryzen Z2 Go GPU to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Ryzen Z2 Go GPU 's Advantages
Released 16 years late
Boost Clock2700MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (28W vs 32W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Ryzen Z2 Go GPU +12859%
4.147 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Jan 2009
Release Date
Jan 2025
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Console GPU
Desktop
Type
Game console
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
-

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
800 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2700 MHz
400 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
16GB
DDR3
Memory Type
LPDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
6.400GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
40
Shading Units
768
4
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
-
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
-
L2 Cache
8 MB
-
L3 Cache
16 MB

Theoretical Performance

1.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
1.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
129.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.294 TFLOPS
32.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.147 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
259.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

32W
TDP
28W
200 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x VHDCI
Outputs
1x USB Type-C
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

RV620
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
RV620 PRO (215-0670006)
GPU Variant
100-000001672
TeraScale
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.181 billion
Transistors
13.1 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
208 mm²

Graphics Features

10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
N/A
OpenCL
2.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.8
© 2025 - TopCPU.net