ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs Intel Arc A350
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 4GB VRAM Arc A350 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 25W)
Intel Arc A350 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2000MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
688 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
Arc A350
+3740%
3.072 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
768
8
TMUs
48
4
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
48.00 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
96.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.144 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.072 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
768.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
25W
200 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
