ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA CMP 40HX
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 8GB VRAM CMP 40HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 185W)
NVIDIA CMP 40HX 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1650MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
2224 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
CMP 40HX
+9403%
7.603 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Feb 2021
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1470 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
8GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
80
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
237.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
15.21 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.603 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
237.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
185W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
TU106
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
TU106-100-A1
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.8
