ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View vs NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro 2460 Multi View and 24GB VRAM RTX 4500 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
ATI FirePro 2460 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (17W vs 210W)
NVIDIA RTX 4500 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock2580MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
7600 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro 2460 Multi View
0.08 TFLOPS
RTX 4500 Ada Generation
+49437%
39.63 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Apr 2010
Release Date
Aug 2023
FirePro Multi-View
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2070 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2580 MHz
500 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
192bit
32.00GB/s
Bandwidth
432.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
60
80
Shading Units
7680
8
TMUs
240
4
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
60
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
206.4 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
619.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
39.63 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.63 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
619.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
17W
TDP
210W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.1
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Cedar
GPU Name
AD103
Cedar GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.292 billion
Transistors
45.9 billion
59 mm²
Die Size
379 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.0
Shader Model
6.7
