Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

AMD FirePro A300 vs Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A300 and 0System Shared VRAM Iris Plus Graphics 640 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Iris Plus Graphics 640 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1100MHz vs 905MHz)
Lower TDP (15W vs 65W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A300
0.695 TFLOPS
Iris Plus Graphics 640 +21%
0.845 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jan 2017
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-M
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

760 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
905 MHz
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
48
8
ROPs
6
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.240 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
21.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
52.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1.690 TFLOPS
695.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
844.8 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
211.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

65W
TDP
15W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Kaby Lake GT3e
A300
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm++
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy