Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

AMD FirePro A320 vs Intel UHD Graphics 605

We compared two Integrated graphics card GPUs: 0System Shared VRAM FirePro A320 and 0System Shared VRAM UHD Graphics 605 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro A320 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 27% (955MHz vs 750MHz)
240 additional rendering cores
Intel UHD Graphics 605 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (5W vs 100W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro A320 +239%
0.733 TFLOPS
UHD Graphics 605
0.216 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Dec 2017
Trinity
Generation
HD Graphics-T
Integrated
Type
Integrated
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
Ring Bus

Clock Speeds

800 MHz
Base Clock
200 MHz
955 MHz
Boost Clock
750 MHz
System Shared
Memory Clock
System Shared

Memory

System Shared
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Dependent
Bandwidth
System Dependent

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
6
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
144
24
TMUs
18
8
ROPs
3
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
-
L1 Cache
-
-
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

7.640 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.250 GPixel/s
22.92 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.50 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
432.0 GFLOPS
733.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
216.0 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
54.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Devastator
GPU Name
Gemini Lake GT1.5
A320
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 3
Architecture
Generation 9.5
TSMC
Foundry
Intel
32 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.303 billion
Transistors
Unknown
246 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

100W
TDP
5W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy