Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

AMD FirePro D300 vs AMD Radeon R9 280X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 3GB VRAM Radeon R9 280X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D300 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)
AMD Radeon R9 280X2 's Advantages
Boost Clock1000MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 280X2 +88%
4.096 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
950 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1000 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
288.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
1280
Shading Units
2048
80
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
32.00 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
375W
450 W
Suggested PSU
750 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
3x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
Tahiti
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
Tahiti XTL (215-0821065)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy