Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

AMD FirePro D300 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro D300 and 16GB VRAM RTX 2000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2130MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 162.6GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D300
2.176 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Ada Generation +451%
12 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Feb 2024
FirePro
Generation
Quadro Ada
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1620 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2130 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
162.6GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

20
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
22
1280
Shading Units
2816
80
TMUs
88
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
88
-
RT Cores
22
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
102.2 GPixel/s
68.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
187.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.00 TFLOPS
2.176 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.00 TFLOPS
136.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
187.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
70W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
4x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
AD107
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy