Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 192GB VRAM B200 SXM 192 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Lower TDP (274W vs 1000W)
NVIDIA B200 SXM 192 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1837MHz
More VRAM (192GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (4100GB/s vs 243.8GB/s)
15360 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
2.227 TFLOPS
B200 SXM 192 GB +2687%
62.08 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2024
FirePro
Generation
Tesla Blackwell
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1665 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1837 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
192GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3e
384bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
4100GB/s

Render Config

24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
132
1536
Shading Units
16896
96
TMUs
528
32
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
528
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
256 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
50 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
44.09 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
969.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
248.3 TFLOPS
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
62.08 TFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
31.04 TFLOPS

Board Design

274W
TDP
1000W
600 W
Suggested PSU
1400 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GB100
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Blackwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
208 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
9.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy