AMD FirePro D500 vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 256MB VRAM FirePro 2450 Multi View to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1496 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+6859%
2.227 TFLOPS
FirePro 2450 Multi View
0.032 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Jan 2009
FirePro
Generation
FirePro Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
32.00 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
274W
TDP
32W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x VHDCI
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
RV620
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
RV620 PRO
(215-0670006)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
