AMD FirePro D500 vs ATI FirePro V3800
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 512MB VRAM FirePro V3800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 9 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1136 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+328%
2.227 TFLOPS
FirePro V3800
0.52 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Apr 2010
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
400
96
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
274W
TDP
43W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort 1.1
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Redwood
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
Redwood PRO GL
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0
