AMD FirePro D500 vs AMD FirePro W2100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W2100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1216 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W2100 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
Boost Clock680MHz
Lower TDP (26W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+411%
2.227 TFLOPS
FirePro W2100
0.435 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Aug 2014
FirePro
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
630 MHz
-
Boost Clock
680 MHz
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
320
96
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.440 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
435.2 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
27.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
274W
TDP
26W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
Oland
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
