AMD FirePro D500 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 274W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro D500
+475%
2.227 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 250
0.387 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
1270 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz
Memory
3GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
243.8GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s
Render Config
24
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1536
Shading Units
128
96
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
23.20 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.23 GPixel/s
69.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
44.93 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.227 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
387.1 GFLOPS
556.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
274W
TDP
150W
600 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
1x SDI
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
Tahiti
GPU Name
G92B
Tahiti LE GL
GPU Variant
G92-428-B1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
260 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
