AMD FirePro M2000 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
96 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 33W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
+66%
0.797 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jul 2012
Release Date
Unknown
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
937 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
25.60GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
3
480
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
-
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
4.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
12.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
480.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS
Board Design
33W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Turks
GPU Name
GP108B
Turks GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
40 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.716 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.0
Shader Model
6.4
