AMD FirePro M3900 vs Intel Arc A730M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 and 12GB VRAM Arc A730M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)
Intel Arc A730M 's Advantages
Released 11 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1100MHz
More VRAM (12GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2912 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
Arc A730M
+2715%
6.758 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Jan 2022
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
300 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1100 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
192bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
3072
8
TMUs
192
4
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
24
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
105.6 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
211.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
13.52 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.758 TFLOPS
-
-
-
Board Design
20W
TDP
80W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
Seymour
GPU Name
DG2-512
Seymour GL
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
