Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 100W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
1184 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 675MX Mac Edition +705%
1.933 TFLOPS

Graphics Card

Oct 2010
Release Date
Apr 2013
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 600M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

2
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
160
Shading Units
1344
8
TMUs
112
4
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.13 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
80.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.933 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
80.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Seymour
GPU Name
GK104
Seymour GL
GPU Variant
N13E-GSR-A2
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1
© 2025 - TopCPU.net