AMD FirePro M3900 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 115W)
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (352.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2144 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2070 Max Q Refresh
+2060%
5.184 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2010
Release Date
Mar 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 20 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1125 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
14.40GB/s
Bandwidth
352.0GB/s
Render Config
2
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
36
160
Shading Units
2304
8
TMUs
144
4
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
36
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
3.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
72.00 GPixel/s
6.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
162.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.37 TFLOPS
240.0 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.184 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
162.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
20W
TDP
115W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Seymour
GPU Name
TU106B
Seymour GL
GPU Variant
-
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.37 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
67 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²
Graphics Features
11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
5.0
Shader Model
6.6
