Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

AMD FirePro M4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M4100 and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1200MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4100
0.514 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 Ti Max Q +378%
2.458 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Apr 2020
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 16 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1200 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.360 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.40 GPixel/s
16.08 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.80 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
4.915 TFLOPS
514.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.458 TFLOPS
32.16 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
76.80 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Mars
GPU Name
TU117
Mars M2 PRO/LP (216-0842009)
GPU Variant
N18P-G62
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
7.5
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy