AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon E9550 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9550 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD Radeon E9550 MXM 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1266MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1920 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
Radeon E9550 MXM
+962%
5.834 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Oct 2013
Release Date
Sep 2016
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1120 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1266 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
1024MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
6
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
144
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
40.51 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
182.3 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.834 TFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.834 TFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
364.6 GFLOPS
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
95W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Opal
GPU Name
Ellesmere
-
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4
