Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

AMD FirePro M4150 vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM FirePro M4150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M4150 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock940MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M4150
0.549 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255 +31%
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Oct 2013
Release Date
Oct 2014
FirePro Mobile
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
925 MHz
-
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

6
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.720 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
17.16 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
549.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
34.32 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

Opal
GPU Name
Topaz
-
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
GCN 1.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.95 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1 (1.2)
OpenCL
2.1
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2.170
-
-
-
6.5 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy