Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

AMD FirePro M8900 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro M8900 +56%
1.306 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 755M Mac Edition
0.833 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Apr 2011
Release Date
Nov 2013
FirePro Mobile
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
115.2GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

12
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
8 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.76 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.680 GPixel/s
32.64 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
34.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1306 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
833.3 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
34.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

Blackcomb
GPU Name
GK107
Blackcomb XT GL
GPU Variant
GT 755M
TeraScale 2
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.7 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.2 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.4
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
-
CUDA
3.0
5.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy