AMD FirePro RG220 vs Intel Arc A380
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 512MB VRAM FirePro RG220 and 6GB VRAM Arc A380 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro RG220 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)
Intel Arc A380 's Advantages
Released 12 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2050MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
944 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro RG220
0.08 TFLOPS
Arc A380
+5147%
4.198 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
May 2010
Release Date
Jun 2022
FirePro RG
Generation
Alchemist(Arc 3)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
2000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2050 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
512MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s
Render Config
1
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
80
Shading Units
1024
8
TMUs
64
4
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
128
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
-
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
2.000 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.60 GPixel/s
4.000 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.397 TFLOPS
80.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.198 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1050 GFLOPS
Board Design
35W
TDP
75W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DMS-59
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
M93
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
TeraScale
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.242 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
73 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
10.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
4.1
Shader Model
6.6
