Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 8400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 256MB VRAM GeForce 8400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +16114%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce 8400
0.021 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Dec 2007
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
1
1792
Shading Units
8
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.160 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.160 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
25W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G98
Orthrus
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
86 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy