Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 512MB VRAM GeForce GT 415 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 10.66GB/s)
1744 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 415 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +2499%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 415 OEM
0.131 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Sep 2010
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 400
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
333 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
10.66GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
6
1792
Shading Units
48
112
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
10.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
130.6 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
32W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GT216
Orthrus
GPU Variant
GT216-305-A3
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy