Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTS 150 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB 's Advantages
Released 5 years late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTS 150 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (141W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive 12GB +624%
3.405 TFLOPS
GeForce GTS 150 OEM
0.47 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Mar 2009
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 100
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
16
1792
Shading Units
128
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
768 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
11.81 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
47.23 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
470.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
141W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
G92
Orthrus
GPU Variant
-
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
1.2
OpenCL
1.1
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy