Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA P104 100

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs NVIDIA P104 100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 4GB VRAM P104 100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA P104 100 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 82% (1733MHz vs 950MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.3GB/s vs 240.0GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (130W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive
3.405 TFLOPS
P104 100 +95%
6.655 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Dec 2017
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
1607 MHz
950 MHz
Boost Clock
1733 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
320.3GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
-
-
SM Count
15
1792
Shading Units
1920
112
TMUs
120
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
768 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
110.9 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
208.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
104.0 GFLOPS
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.655 TFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
208.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
130W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
GP104
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
GP104-100-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy