Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM FirePro S10000 Passive and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S10000 Passive 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock950MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (240.0GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1712 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S10000 Passive +3174%
3.405 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2012
Release Date
Jan 2011
FirePro
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

825 MHz
Base Clock
-
950 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
240.0GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
80
112
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
768 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
106.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
3.405 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
851.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

375W
TDP
19W
750 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tahiti
GPU Name
Cedar
Tahiti PRO GL
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
GCN 1.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
4.313 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
352 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
1.2
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy