Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

AMD FirePro S7000 vs NVIDIA CMP 170HX

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM FirePro S7000 and 16GB VRAM CMP 170HX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA CMP 170HX 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1493GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
3200 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7000
2.432 TFLOPS
CMP 170HX +419%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2012
Release Date
Sep 2021
FirePro
Generation
Mining GPUs
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1140 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
1200 MHz
Memory Clock
1458 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2e
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
153.6GB/s
Bandwidth
1493GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
70
20
Compute Units
-
1280
Shading Units
4480
80
TMUs
280
32
ROPs
128
-
Tensor Cores
280
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

30.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
180.5 GPixel/s
76.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
50.53 TFLOPS
2.432 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
152.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.317 TFLOPS

Graphics Processor

Pitcairn
GPU Name
GA100
Pitcairn XT GL (215-0828073)
GPU Variant
GA100-105F-A1
GCN 1.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
2.8 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
212 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
1.2
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy