Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

AMD FirePro S7150 vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
2008 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +8871%
3.768 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400 PRO AGP
0.042 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Jun 2007
FirePro
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
40
128
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.100 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.100 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
42.00 GFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
RV610
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
RV610 LE AGP (215LKBALA15FG)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
5 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
2.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.2
Vulkan
N/A
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy