Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

AMD FirePro S7150 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1280 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +106%
3.768 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Aug 2015
FirePro
Generation
GeForce 900
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1024 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1188 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
768
128
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.02 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
57.02 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.825 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
90W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
GM206
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
GM206-250-A1
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.2
Vulkan
1.3
-
CUDA
5.2
6.3
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy