Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

AMD FirePro S7150 vs AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 270 1024SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 153.6GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R9 270 1024SP 's Advantages
Boost Clock925MHz

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 +98%
3.768 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 270 1024SP
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Mar 2015
FirePro
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
153.6GB/s

Render Config

32
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
1024
128
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.60 GPixel/s
117.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
7.537 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.768 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
235.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
118.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Tonga XT GL
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.2
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.3
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy