AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs Intel Arc Pro A40
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 6GB VRAM Arc Pro A40 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 6GB)
768 additional rendering cores
Intel Arc Pro A40 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (50W vs 265W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2
3.297 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A40
+5%
3.482 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Feb 2016
Release Date
Aug 2022
FirePro Server
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
1500 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
8GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
96bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s
Render Config
28
Compute Units
-
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
1024
112
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
54.40 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.8 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
6.963 TFLOPS
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.482 TFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
870.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
265W
TDP
50W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
Tonga
GPU Name
DG2-128
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
GCN 3.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
5 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
3.0
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.3
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
6.6
