Home GPU Comparison AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD FirePro W4000

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 vs AMD FirePro W4000

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM FirePro S7150 x2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD FirePro S7150 x2 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro W4000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 265W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
FirePro S7150 x2 +160%
3.297 TFLOPS
FirePro W4000
1.267 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2016
Release Date
Aug 2012
FirePro Server
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
102.4GB/s

Render Config

28
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1792
Shading Units
768
112
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per CU)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

29.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
103.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.60 GTexel/s
3.297 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
3.297 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1267 GFLOPS
206.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
79.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

265W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

Tonga
GPU Name
Pitcairn
Cloudy Tau
GPU Variant
Pitcairn LE GL
GCN 3.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
366 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
2.1
OpenCL
1.2
1.2.170
Vulkan
1.2
-
-
-
6.5
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy